Tuesday, March 9, 2010

Grading Guide (Based on College Board’s essay scoring procedures)

Grade of A:

An essay in this category demonstrates clear and consistent mastery, although it may have a few minor errors. A typical essay:

· Effectively and insightfully develops a point of view on the issue and demonstrates outstanding critical thinking, using clearly appropriate examples, reasons and other evidence to support its position

· Is well organized and clearly focused, demonstrating clear coherence and smooth progression of ideas

· Exhibits skillful use of language, using a varied, accurate and apt vocabulary

· Demonstrates meaningful variety in sentence structure

· Is free of most errors in grammar, usage and mechanics

Grade of B:

An essay in this category demonstrates reasonably consistent mastery, although it has occasional errors or lapses in quality. A typical essay:

· Effectively develops a point of view on the issue and demonstrates strong critical thinking, generally using appropriate examples, reasons and other evidence to support its position

· Is well organized and focused, demonstrating coherence and progression of ideas

· Exhibits facility in the use of language, using appropriate vocabulary

· Demonstrates variety in sentence structure

· Is generally free of most errors in grammar, usage and mechanics

Grade of C:

An essay in this category demonstrates adequate mastery, although it has lapses in quality. A typical essay:

· Develops a point of view on the issue and demonstrates competent critical thinking, using adequate examples, reasons and other evidence to support its position

· Is generally organized and focused, demonstrating some coherence and progression of ideas

· Exhibits adequate but inconsistent facility in the use of language, using generally appropriate vocabulary

· Demonstrates some variety in sentence structure

· Has some errors in grammar, usage and mechanics

Grade of D:

An essay in this category demonstrates a developing mastery, and is marked by ONE OR MORE of the following weaknesses:

· Develops a point of view on the issue, demonstrating some critical thinking, but may do so inconsistently or use inadequate examples, reasons or other evidence to support its position

· Is limited in its organization or focus, or may demonstrate some lapses in coherence or progression of ideas

Displays developing facility in the use of language, but sometimes uses weak vocabulary or inappropriate word choice

· Lacks variety or demonstrates problems in sentence structure

· Contains an accumulation of errors in grammar, usage and mechanics

Failing Grade:

An essay in this category demonstrates little mastery, and is flawed by ONE OR MORE of the following weaknesses:

· Develops a point of view on the issue that is vague or seriously limited, and demonstrates weak critical thinking, providing inappropriate or insufficient examples, reasons or other evidence to support its position

· Is poorly organized and/or focused, or demonstrates serious problems with coherence or progression of ideas

· Displays very little facility in the use of language, using very limited vocabulary or incorrect word choice

· Demonstrates frequent problems in sentence structure

· Contains errors in grammar, usage and mechanics so serious that meaning is somewhat obscured

3 comments:

  1. My only suggestion for revising this grading system is that we include some explicit language regarding thesis statements. Like, under the criteria for A, we could add something like: "The paper is focused around a clearly stated, arguable thesis statement." Under F, something like: "The paper is flawed by lack of a coherent thesis statement."

    On further reflection, this addition would be redundant with what the rubric already says about "developing a point of view on the issue," but I still think it's a good idea to explicitly say that we're evaluating the clarity and incisiveness of their thesis statements. Perhaps we could just replace "point of view on the issue" with "thesis statement" wherever it appears on the rubric?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I like the idea of adapting the evaluation Dr. Ryan gave us in the Writing Lab. Even if we don't adapt the grades into the sheet, at least students will be able to see what we're looking for when we review their papers.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think this evaluation works, but I don't know if it is explicit enough for the students. I like the idea of putting "thesis statement" in directly and possibly putting "MLA formatting" under grammar and mechanics.

    ReplyDelete